For over 25 years, we have been at the heart of processing offline donations received through Direct Mail – giving charities a reliable, cost-effective, and compliant way to bank and thank their supporters. 

We spoke with Paul Nichols, who heads up our Operations Team in the Digital Mail Hub, to understand what goes on behind the scenes. 

• 1. Can you describe the primary responsibilities and day-to-day activities of the response team? 

Each morning, our digital mailroom receives a mix of postal donations. These are counted, sorted, and categorised based on the charity and campaign. It’s the start of a highly tuned operation that’s efficient from the outset. 

We use a combination of post-opening machines and manual handling to batch responses for processing. From there, the batches go through data capture – either scanned digitally or entered manually by our team. 

Once that’s complete, donations are securely banked, and we produce detailed exports with supporter information, donation amounts, and any record updates our clients need. Where requested, we also send personalised thank-you letters or emails. 

• 2. How many team members work with you in the response team? 

We’ve got a dedicated Response team of around 30, working a mix of working patterns all within our York operations. Everyone has a primary area, but we’re cross-trained, which means we can shift cover quickly to keep things flowing. 

• 3. How does the response team align with the overall mission and goals of the company? 

Service excellence is central to what we do at Elovate. The response team is involved right at the start of donation processing, so our performance directly impacts how quickly and accurately we can deliver results. 

While some of the validation takes place in York, hitting our SLAs is only possible through joined-up work across all departments. 

• 4. What are the current projects and initiatives that the response team is focusing on? 

We’re focusing on improving our digital offering and refining our postal processes. Those are the two areas my team is most involved in. 

All of this is part of our wider commitment to giving clients a complete, one-stop shop for response handling and supporter communication. 

• 5. What changes have taken place over recent months and what impact have these had? 

This year, we’ve made two main changes. First, we upgraded our automated system to handle multiple barcodes and QR codes – it can now read data with minimal human input. 

Second, we’ve expanded what our digital mailroom can do. It’s no longer just a response hub – we’ve seen more demand for scanning Head Office post and other documents, which gives charities a more cost-effective option, especially with rising operating costs. 

• 6. How does the team measure success? What metrics are used? 

We hold daily check-ins with heads of department to review performance. That includes volumes, processing times, campaign types – everything from start to finish. 

We rely on solid data to keep track and adjust as needed. The aim is always high-quality output that meets our SLAs. 

• 7. What are the biggest challenges currently faced by the response team, and how do you overcome these? 

The biggest challenge is managing fluctuations in volume. We can get anything from 2,000 to over 35,000+ responses in a day, and they all need to be processed to deadline. 

To stay ahead, we rely on strong client forecasting, a flexible team, and smart cross-training. Having people who can jump between roles helps us move resource quickly where it’s most needed. We are also very fortunate to have two UK offices that are cross trained on our Cloud based platform which enables us to utilise more resource and experience when needed 

• 8. Can you discuss any recent team achievements or milestones? 

Peak is always our big test – and I’m proud to say we met our SLAs again this year. 

We also recently handled a major charity campaign with over 50,000 responses in a short space of time,  all of which needed to be processed and exported in a tight deadline. All requirements were met, and this was only accomplished by using both UK teams, utilising our technology but, more importantly it was a good example of how our people and systems work together when it counts. 

Back to Stories